Side Effects

March 11, 2024

15,401 words

Post contents

While you can build static websites with React, Angular, and Vue, these frameworks shine brightest when building interactive applications.

These applications come in many shapes, forms, and functionalities, but all have one thing in common: They take live input from the user and display information back to the user.

This is the key difference between a static site and an interactive one; static sites show their contents and then allow the user to navigate through the site without drastic changes to the displayed content; meanwhile, interactive sites drastically shift their displayed information based off of user input.

This difference carries through to how you build the application as well. A static site might prioritize an initial load by front-loading the HTML compilation through server-side render (SSR) or static site generation (SSG). On the other hand, the interactive app is more likely to focus on processing information passed to it to customize your experience.

As interactive apps rely so heavily on processing information based on user input, React, Angular, and Vue, all provide built-in ways of interacting, intercepting, and otherwise ingesting this information.

While each of these frameworks handles this input ingestion slightly differently, the underlying concepts are the same: All user input and output generate "Side effects", which need to be handled.

This raises more questions than it answers:

  • What is a side effect?
  • How do these frameworks handle side effects?
  • How does the browser notify the framework about side effects?
  • How do you ensure side effects are cleaned up?
  • How do you handle in-component side effects?

Let's answer these questions one by one, starting with:

What Is a Side Effect?

A side effect is when a piece of code changes or relies on state outside its local environment. When a piece of code does not contain a side effect, it is considered "pure."

A pure function is allowed to mutate state from within its local environment, while a side effect changes data outside its own environment

For example, say we have the following code:

function pureFn() {	let data = 0;	data++;	return data;}

This logic would be considered "pure," as it does not rely on external data sources. However, if we move the data variable outside the local environment and mutate it elsewhere:

let data;function increment() {	data++;}function setupData() {	data = 0;	increment();	return data;}

increment would be considered a "side effect" that mutates a variable outside its own environment.

When does this come into play in a production application?

This is a great question! A great example of this occurs in the browser with the window and document APIs.

Say we wanted to store a global counter that we use in multiple parts of the app; we might store this in window.

window.shoppingCartItems = 0;function addToShoppingCart() {	window.shoppingCartItems++;}addToShoppingCart();addToShoppingCart();addToShoppingCart(); // window.shoppingCartItems is now `3`

Because window is a global variable, mutating a value within it is a "side effect" when done inside a function, as the window variable was not declared within the function's scope.

Notice how our addToShoppingCart method isn't returning anything; instead, it's mutating the window variable as a side effect to update a global value. If we attempted to remove side effects from addToShoppingCart without introducing a new variable, we'd be left with the following:

window.shoppingCartItems = 0;function addToShoppingCart() {	// Nothing is happening here.	// No side effects? Yay.	// No functionality? Boo.}addToShoppingCart();addToShoppingCart();addToShoppingCart(); // window.shoppingCartItems is still `0`

Notice how addToShoppingCart now does nothing. To remove side effects while still retaining the functionality of incrementing a value, we'd have to both:

  1. Pass an input
  2. Return a value

With these changes, it might look something like this:

function addToShoppingCart(val) {	return val + 1;}let shoppingCartItems = 0;shoppingCartItems = addToShoppingCart(shoppingCartItems);shoppingCartItems = addToShoppingCart(shoppingCartItems);shoppingCartItems = addToShoppingCart(shoppingCartItems);// shoppingCartItems is now `3`

Because of the inherent nature of side effects, this demonstrates how all functions that don't return a new value either do nothing or have a side effect within them.

Further, because an application's inputs and outputs (combined, often called "I/O") come from the user rather than from the function itself, all I/O operations are considered "side effects". This means that in addition to non-returning functions, all the following are considered "side effects":

  • A user typing something
  • A user clicking something
  • Saving a file
  • Loading a file
  • Making a network request
  • Printing something to a printer
  • Logging a value to console

How Do Frameworks Handle Side Effects?

As mentioned previously, side effects are mission-critical for the kinds of applications that React, Angular, and Vue are all purpose-built for. To make side effect handling easier, each framework has its own method of running code on behalf of the developer when specific events occur in the component.

Component events a framework might listen for include:

The first of these component events is commonly fully transparent to most developers: User input bindings.

Take the following, for example:

const Comp = () => {	const sayHi = () => alert("Hi!");	return <button onClick={sayHi}>Say hello</button>;};
@Component({	selector: "comp-comp",	standalone: true,	template: ` <button (click)="sayHi()">Say hello</button> `,})class CompComponent {	sayHi() {		alert("Hi!");	}}
<!-- Comp.vue --><script setup>const sayHi = () => alert("Hi!");</script><template>	<button @click="sayHi()">Say hello</button></template>

This component handles a click event (which is a user input — a side effect) and outputs an alert to the user in return (an output, another side effect).

See? Events are commonly hidden from the user when using one of these frameworks.

Let's look back at the four most common types of component side effect origin points:

  • User input events

  • A component rendering for the first time

  • A component being removed from the screen as part of a conditional render

  • A component's data or passed properties changing

While the first one was easy enough to tackle, the last three component events are often trickier to solve from a developer experience standpoint.

Often, a framework may implement an API corresponding to a developer-defined function (run by the framework) as a one-to-one matching of these events that occur during a component's lifespan. When a framework has a one-to-one mapping of function-to-lifecycle events, this mapping creates a series of APIs called "Lifecycle Methods"**. Angular and Vue both have lifecycle methods as part of their core APIs.

On the other hand, some frameworks choose to implement side effect handling without lifecycle methods. React is a key example of this, but Vue also has a non-lifecycle method of managing side effects in a component.

To explore what these side-effect handlers can do, let's look at an example of a handler that runs during a component's initial render.

Initial Render Side Effects

When we introduced components, we touched on the concept of "rendering". This occurs when a component is drawn on-screen, either when the user loads a page for the first time or when shown or hidden using a conditional render.

Say we have the following code:

const Child = () => {	return <p>I am the child</p>;};const Parent = () => {	const [showChild, setShowChild] = useState(true);	return (		<div>			<button onClick={() => setShowChild(!showChild)}>Toggle Child</button>			{showChild && <Child />}		</div>	);};
@Component({	selector: "child-comp",	standalone: true,	template: "<p>I am the child</p>",})class ChildComponent {}@Component({	selector: "parent-comp",	standalone: true,	imports: [ChildComponent],	template: `		<div>			<button (click)="setShowChild()">Toggle Child</button>			@if (showChild) {				<child-comp />			}		</div>	`,})class ParentComponent {	showChild = true;	setShowChild() {		this.showChild = !this.showChild;	}}
<!-- Child.vue --><template>	<p>I am the child</p></template>
<!-- Parent.vue --><script setup>import { ref } from "vue";import Child from "./Child.vue";const showChild = ref(true);function setShowChild() {	showChild.value = !showChild.value;}</script><template>	<div>		<button @click="setShowChild()">Toggle Child</button>		<Child v-if="showChild" />	</div></template>

Here, Child is added and removed from the DOM every time setShowChild is clicked. Let's say we wanted to add a way to call a console.log every time Child is shown on screen.

Remember, console.log outputs data to the user (albeit in a DevTools panel). As such, it's technically a side effect to call console.log.

While we could add this log inside of setShowChild, it's more likely to break when we inevitably refactor the Parent component's code. Instead, let's add a side effect handler to call console.log whenever Child is rendered.

Two Hooks handle all side effects within React components: useEffect and useLayoutEffect. Let's start by looking at useEffect:

import { useEffect } from "react";const Child = () => {	// Pass a function that React will run for you	useEffect(() => {		console.log("I am rendering");		// Pass an array of items to track changes of	}, []);	return <p>I am the child</p>;};

Here, we're completing the task of "run console.log when Child is rendered for the first time" by allowing React to run the console.log side effect inside of useEffect. The empty array hints to React that we'd only like this function to run once — when the component initially renders.

The empty array passed to useEffect has a fair bit of nuance to it, which we'll learn about later.

We mentioned earlier that there is another hook used to handle side effects: useLayoutEffect. While useLayoutEffect is useful, it requires a bit of pre-requisite knowledge that we'll touch on throughout this chapter. Let's put it to the side and come back to it later.

To execute code during an initial render of a component, Angular uses a method called ngOnInit. This function is specially named so that Angular can call it on your behalf during the "rendered" lifecycle event:

import { Component, OnInit } from "@angular/core";@Component({	selector: "child-comp",	standalone: true,	template: "<p>I am the child</p>",})class ChildComponent implements OnInit {	ngOnInit() {		console.log("I am rendering");	}}

All of Angular's lifecycle methods are prepended with ng and add implements to your component class.

This implements clause helps TypeScript figure out which methods have which properties and throws an error when the related method is not included in the class.

While Angular strictly uses lifecycle methods and React uses a useEffect hook to handle side effects, Vue does a bit of both.

Let's start by taking a look at Vue's lifecycle method of handling a side effect.

Vue's onMounted Lifecycle Method
<!-- Child.vue --><script setup>import { onMounted } from "vue";onMounted(() => {	console.log("I am rendering");});</script><template>	<p>I am the child</p></template>

Here, we're importing the onMounted lifecycle handler from the vue import. Vue's lifecycle methods all start with an on prefix when used inside a <script setup> component.

Vue's watchEffect Hook

Just like how React has a non-lifecycle method of running side effect, so too does Vue. This is done using Vue's watchEffect and watch APIs. Let's start with a simple example:

<!-- Child.vue --><script setup>import { watchEffect } from "vue";watchEffect(() => {	console.log("I am rendering");});</script><template>	<p>I am the child</p></template>

Here, we're using watchEffect to run console.log as soon as the Child component renders.

Instead, watchEffect is commonly expected to be used alongside reactive values (like ref variables). We'll touch on how this works later on in the chapter.

As mentioned before, the framework itself calls these methods on your behalf when an internal event occurs; in this case, when Child is rendered.

Try clicking the toggle button repeatedly, and you'll see that the console.log occurs every time the Child component renders again.

Using Side Effects in Production

On top of providing a global variable that we can mutate to store values, both window and document expose a number of APIs that can be useful in an application.

Let's say that inside our component, we'd like to display the window size:

const WindowSize = () => {	const [height, setHeight] = useState(window.innerHeight);	const [width, setWidth] = useState(window.innerWidth);	return (		<div>			<p>Height: {height}</p>			<p>Width: {width}</p>		</div>	);};
@Component({	selector: "window-size",	standalone: true,	template: `		<div>			<p>Height: {{ height }}</p>			<p>Width: {{ width }}</p>		</div>	`,})class WindowSizeComponent {	height = window.innerHeight;	width = window.innerWidth;}
<!-- WindowSize.vue --><script setup>const height = window.innerHeight;const width = window.innerWidth;</script><template>	<div>		<p>Height: {{ height }}</p>		<p>Width: {{ width }}</p>	</div></template>

This works to display the window size on the initial render, but what happens when the user resizes their browser?

Because we aren't listening for the change in window size, we never get an updated render with the new screen size!

Let's solve this by using window.addEventListener to handle resize events — emitted when the user changes their window size.

const WindowSize = () => {	const [height, setHeight] = useState(window.innerHeight);	const [width, setWidth] = useState(window.innerWidth);	useEffect(() => {		function resizeHandler() {			setHeight(window.innerHeight);			setWidth(window.innerWidth);		}		// This code will cause a memory leak, more on that soon		window.addEventListener("resize", resizeHandler);	}, []);	return (		<div>			<p>Height: {height}</p>			<p>Width: {width}</p>		</div>	);};
@Component({	selector: "window-size",	standalone: true,	template: `		<div>			<p>Height: {{ height }}</p>			<p>Width: {{ width }}</p>		</div>	`,})class WindowSizeComponent implements OnInit {	height = window.innerHeight;	width = window.innerWidth;	resizeHandler = () => {		this.height = window.innerHeight;		this.width = window.innerWidth;	};	ngOnInit() {		// This code will cause a memory leak, more on that soon		window.addEventListener("resize", this.resizeHandler);	}}

You may notice that we're using an arrow function for resizeHandler. This arrow function helps us bind this in resizeHandler back to the WindowSizeComponent instance.

If this sentence feels unfamiliar, no worries; I wrote an article explaining what this means.

<!-- WindowSize.vue --><script setup>import { ref, onMounted } from "vue";const height = ref(window.innerHeight);const width = ref(window.innerWidth);function resizeHandler() {	height.value = window.innerHeight;	width.value = window.innerWidth;}onMounted(() => {	// This code will cause a memory leak, more on that soon	window.addEventListener("resize", resizeHandler);});</script><template>	<div>		<p>Height: {{ height }}</p>		<p>Width: {{ width }}</p>	</div></template>

Now, when we resize the browser, our values on-screen should update as well.

Event Bubbling Aside

In our introduction to components, we demonstrated that components can listen to HTML events.

What if we changed our code above to listen for the resize event that way to sidestep addEventListener?

const WindowSize = () => {	const [height, setHeight] = useState(window.innerHeight);	const [width, setWidth] = useState(window.innerWidth);	function resizeHandler() {		setHeight(window.innerHeight);		setWidth(window.innerWidth);	}	// This code doesn't work, we'll explain why soon	return (		<div onResize={resizeHandler}>			<p>Height: {height}</p>			<p>Width: {width}</p>		</div>	);};
@Component({	selector: "window-size",	standalone: true,	template: `		<!-- This code doesn't work, we'll explain why soon -->		<div (resize)="resizeHandler()">			<p>Height: {{ height }}</p>			<p>Width: {{ width }}</p>		</div>	`,})class WindowSizeComponent {	height = window.innerHeight;	width = window.innerWidth;	resizeHandler() {		this.height = window.innerHeight;		this.width = window.innerWidth;	}}
<!-- WindowSize.vue --><script setup>import { ref } from "vue";const height = ref(window.innerHeight);const width = ref(window.innerWidth);function resizeHandler() {	height.value = window.innerHeight;	width.value = window.innerWidth;}</script><template>	<!-- This code doesn't work, we'll explain why soon -->	<div @resize="resizeHandler()">		<p>Height: {{ height }}</p>		<p>Width: {{ width }}</p>	</div></template>

If we run this code, it will render as expected with the initial screen size, but subsequent re-renders will not update the value on the screen. This is because the resize event is only triggered on the window object (associated with the <html> tag) and does not permeate downwards towards other elements.

You see, by default, events will always "bubble" upwards in the DOM tree from their emitted position. So, if we click on a div, the click event will start from the div and bubble all the way up to the html tag.

A click event bubbling to the top of the document

We can demonstrate this inside our frameworks.

<div onClick={() => logMessage()}>	<p>		<span style={{ color: "red" }}>Click me</span> or even		<span style={{ background: "green", color: "white" }}>me</span>!	</p></div>
<div (click)="logMessage()">	<p>		<span style="color: red">Click me</span> or even		<span style="background: green; color: white;">me</span>!	</p></div>
<div @click="logMessage()">	<p>		<span style="color: red">Click me</span> or even		<span style="background: green; color: white;">me</span>!	</p></div>

If you click on the span, the click event will start from the span, bubble up to the p tag, and then finally bubble up to the div. Because we add an event listener on the div, it will run logMessage, even when clicking on the span.

This is why we don't simply utilize event binding for the resize event: It's only ever emitted directly from the html node. Because of this behavior, if we want to access the resize event inside our WindowSize component, we need to use addEventListener.

You can learn more about event bubbling, how it works, and how to overwrite it in specific instances from Mozilla Developer Network.

Cleaning up Side Effects

Let's put down the code for a moment and talk about side effects with an analogy.

Let's say you're watching a TV show on a television that lacks the ability to rewind or go forward but does have the ability to pause.

This might sound weird, but stick with me.

You're right at the peak moment of the show when suddenly your smoke alarm goes off.

"Oh no!" Your popcorn burnt in the microwave.

You have two options:

  1. Pause the show, then stop the microwave.
  2. Don't pause the show; go stop the microwave immediately.

While the second option might be the more natural reaction at a moment's notice, you'll find yourself with a problem: You just missed the big announcement in the show, and now you're left confused when you return to the TV.

Given your particular TV's lack of rewind functionality, you'd be stuck where you were without restarting the episode.

However, if you had paused the show, you would have been able to unpause once you'd turned off the microwave and see what the big reveal was.


Surely, this analogy has little to do with frontend development, right?

Ahh, but it does!

See, think of the TV as being a component in your app with a side effect. Let's use this clock component as an example:

const Clock = () => {	const [time, setTime] = useState(formatDate(new Date()));	useEffect(() => {		setInterval(() => {			console.log("I am updating the time");			setTime(formatDate(new Date()));		}, 1000);	}, []);	return <p role="timer">Time is: {time}</p>;};function formatDate(date) {	return (		prefixZero(date.getHours()) +		":" +		prefixZero(date.getMinutes()) +		":" +		prefixZero(date.getSeconds())	);}function prefixZero(number) {	if (number < 10) {		return "0" + number.toString();	}	return number.toString();}
@Component({	selector: "clock-comp",	standalone: true,	template: ` <p role="timer">Time is: {{ time }}</p> `,})class ClockComponent implements OnInit {	time = formatDate(new Date());	ngOnInit() {		setInterval(() => {			console.log("I am updating the time");			this.time = formatDate(new Date());		}, 1000);	}}function formatDate(date: Date) {	return (		prefixZero(date.getHours()) +		":" +		prefixZero(date.getMinutes()) +		":" +		prefixZero(date.getSeconds())	);}function prefixZero(number: number) {	if (number < 10) {		return "0" + number.toString();	}	return number.toString();}
<!-- Clock.vue --><script setup>import { ref, onMounted } from "vue";const time = ref(formatDate(new Date()));onMounted(() => {	setInterval(() => {		console.log("I am updating the time");		time.value = formatDate(new Date());	}, 1000);});function formatDate(date) {	return (		prefixZero(date.getHours()) +		":" +		prefixZero(date.getMinutes()) +		":" +		prefixZero(date.getSeconds())	);}function prefixZero(number) {	if (number < 10) {		return "0" + number.toString();	}	return number.toString();}</script><template>	<p role="timer">Time is: {{ time }}</p></template>

In this example, we're calling setInterval to run a function every second. This function does two things:

  1. Updates time to include the current Date's hour, minute, and second hand in its string
  2. console.log a message

This setInterval call occurs on every Clock component render, thanks to each of the frameworks' side effect handlers.

Let's now render this Clock component inside a conditional block:

function App() {	const [showClock, setShowClock] = useState(true);	return (		<div>			<button onClick={() => setShowClock(!showClock)}>Toggle clock</button>			{showClock && <Clock />}		</div>	);}
@Component({	selector: "app-root",	standalone: true,	imports: [ClockComponent],	template: `		<div>			<button (click)="setShowClock(!showClock)">Toggle clock</button>			@if (showClock) {				<clock-comp />			}		</div>	`,})class AppComponent {	showClock = true;	setShowClock(val: boolean) {		this.showClock = val;	}}
<!-- App.vue --><script setup>import Clock from "./Clock.vue";import { ref } from "vue";const showClock = ref(true);function setShowClock(val) {	showClock.value = val;}</script><template>	<div>		<button @click="setShowClock(!showClock)">Toggle clock</button>		<Clock v-if="showClock" />	</div></template>

In App, we're defaulting showClock to true. This means that our Clock component will render on App's first render.

We can visually see that our clock is updating every second, but the really interesting part to us is the console.log. If we open up our browser's developer tools, we can see that it's logging every time it updates on screen as well.

However, let's toggle the Clock component a couple of times by clicking the button.

When we toggle the clock from rendering each time, it doesn't stop the console.log from running. However, when we re-render Clock, it creates a new interval of console.logs. This means that if we toggle the Clock component three times, it will run console.log three times for each update of the on-screen time.

This is really bad behavior. Not only does this mean that our computer is running more code than needed in the background, but it also means that the function that was passed to the setInterval call cannot be cleaned up by your browser. This means that your setInterval function (and all variables within it) stays in memory, which may eventually cause an out-of-memory crash if it occurs too frequently.

Moreover, this can directly impact your applications' functionality as well. Let's take a look at how that can happen:

Broken Production Code

Imagine that you are building an alarm clock application. You want to have the following functionality:

  • Show the remaining time on an alarm
  • Show a "wake up" screen
  • "Snooze" alarms for 5 minutes (temporarily reset the countdown of the timer to 5 minutes)
  • Disable alarms entirely

Additionally, let's throw in the ability to auto-snooze alarms that have been going off for 10 minutes. After all, someone in a deep sleep is more likely to wake up from a change in noise volume rather than a repeating loud noise.

Let's build that functionality now, but reduce the "minutes" to "seconds" for easier testing:

function AlarmScreen({ snooze, disable }) {	useEffect(() => {		setTimeout(() => {			// Automatically snooze the alarm			// after 10 seconds of inactivity			// In production, this would be 10 minutes			snooze();		}, 10 * 1000);	}, []);	return (		<div>			<p>Time to wake up!</p>			<button onClick={snooze}>Snooze for 5 seconds</button>			<button onClick={disable}>Turn off alarm</button>		</div>	);}function App() {	const [secondsLeft, setSecondsLeft] = useState(5);	const [timerEnabled, setTimerEnabled] = useState(true);	useEffect(() => {		setInterval(() => {			setSecondsLeft((v) => {				if (v === 0) return v;				return v - 1;			});		}, 1000);	}, []);	const snooze = () => {		// In production, this would add 5 minutes, not 5 seconds		setSecondsLeft((v) => v + 5);	};	const disable = () => {		setTimerEnabled(false);	};	if (!timerEnabled) {		return <p>There is no timer</p>;	}	if (secondsLeft === 0) {		return <AlarmScreen snooze={snooze} disable={disable} />;	}	return <p>{secondsLeft} seconds left in timer</p>;}
@Component({	selector: "alarm-screen",	standalone: true,	template: `		<div>			<p>Time to wake up!</p>			<button (click)="snooze.emit()">Snooze for 5 seconds</button>			<button (click)="disable.emit()">Turn off alarm</button>		</div>	`,})class AlarmScreenComponent implements OnInit {	@Output() snooze = new EventEmitter();	@Output() disable = new EventEmitter();	ngOnInit() {		setTimeout(() => {			// Automatically snooze the alarm			// after 10 seconds of inactivity			// In production this would be 10 minutes			this.snooze.emit();		}, 10 * 1000);	}}@Component({	selector: "app-root",	standalone: true,	imports: [AlarmScreenComponent],	template: `		@if (!timerEnabled) {			<p>There is no timer</p>		} @else if (secondsLeft === 0) {			<alarm-screen				(snooze)="snooze()"				(disable)="disable()"			/>		} @else {			<p>{{ secondsLeft }} seconds left in timer</p>		}	`,})class AppComponent implements OnInit {	secondsLeft = 5;	timerEnabled = true;	ngOnInit() {		setInterval(() => {			if (this.secondsLeft === 0) return;			this.secondsLeft = this.secondsLeft - 1;		}, 1000);	}	snooze() {		// In production, this would add 5 minutes, not 5 seconds		this.secondsLeft = this.secondsLeft + 5;	}	disable() {		this.timerEnabled = false;	}}
<!-- AlarmScreen.vue --><script setup>import { onMounted } from "vue";const props = defineProps(["snooze", "disable"]);onMounted(() => {	setTimeout(() => {		// Automatically snooze the alarm		// after 10 seconds of inactivity		// In production, this would be 10 minutes		props.snooze();	}, 10 * 1000);});</script><template>	<div>		<p>Time to wake up!</p>		<button @click="props.snooze()">Snooze for 5 seconds</button>		<button @click="props.disable()">Turn off alarm</button>	</div></template>
<!-- App.vue --><script setup>import AlarmScreen from "./AlarmScreen.vue";import { ref, onMounted } from "vue";const secondsLeft = ref(5);const timerEnabled = ref(true);onMounted(() => {	setInterval(() => {		if (secondsLeft.value === 0) return;		secondsLeft.value = secondsLeft.value - 1;	}, 1000);});const snooze = () => {	// In production, this would add 5 minutes, not 5 seconds	secondsLeft.value = secondsLeft.value + 5;};const disable = () => {	timerEnabled.value = false;};</script><template>	<p v-if="!timerEnabled">There is no timer</p>	<AlarmScreen		v-else-if="secondsLeft === 0"		:snooze="snooze"		:disable="disable"	/>	<p v-else>{{ secondsLeft }} seconds left in timer</p></template>

You'll notice that we're not using events for our Vue code sample and have instead opted to pass a function. This is because, while the other frameworks will continue to listen for events from an unmounted component, Vue does not.

This doesn't mean that Vue solves this issue for us, however. While passing a function is less common than using an output in Vue, it's not the only way to do things. Moreover, while using Vue's output to handle snooze and disable functionality solves the issue from the user's standpoint; it doesn't solve the memory leak that you're creating by not cleaning up your setTimeout.

To understand this a bit better, there's a section of this chapter that explains this.

Yes! It renders the seconds to countdown and then shows the AlarmScreen as expected. Even our "auto-snooze" functionality is working as intended.

Let's test our manual "snooze" button and see if that works as expe-...

Wait, did the timer screen go from 4 seconds to 9? That's not how a countdown works!

Sure enough, if you happen to click the manual "Snooze" button right before the auto-snooze goes off, it will add an extra 5 seconds to your existing countdown.

This occurs because we never tell the AlarmScreen's setTimeout to stop running, even when AlarmScreen is no longer rendered.

// AlarmScreen componentsetTimeout(() => {	snooze();}, 10 * 1000);

When the above code's snooze runs, it will add 4 seconds to the secondsLeft variable through the App's snooze method.

To solve this, we simply need to tell our AlarmScreen component to cancel the setTimeout when it's no longer rendered. Let's look at we can do that with a side effect handler.

Unmounting

In our previous code sample, we showed that mounted side effects left unclean will cause bugs in our apps and performance headaches for our users.

Let's clean up these side effects using a handler that runs during a component's unmounting. To do this, we'll use JavaScript's clearTimeout to remove any setTimeouts that are left unrun:

const timeout = setTimeout(() => {	// ...}, 1000);// This stops a timeout from running if unran.// Otherwise, it does nothing.clearTimeout(timeout);

Similarly, when using setInterval, there's a clearInterval method we can use for cleanup:

const interval = setInterval(() => {	// ...}, 1000);// This stops an interval from runningclearInterval(interval);

To run a cleanup function on React's useEffect, return a function inside the useEffect.

const Cleanup = () => {	useEffect(() => {		return () => {			alert("I am cleaning up");		};	}, []);	return <p>Unmount me to see an alert</p>;};

This returned function will be run whenever:

  • useEffect is re-ran.
    • The returned function is run before the new useEffect instance is run.
  • Comp is unrendered.

It may seem like I said the same thing twice here, however useEffect can be run independent of a component's initial render. More on that soon.

Let's apply this returned function to our code sample previously:

function AlarmScreen({ snooze, disable }) {	useEffect(() => {		const timeout = setTimeout(() => {			// Automatically snooze the alarm			// after 10 seconds of inactivity			// In production, this would be 10 minutes			snooze();		}, 10 * 1000);		return () => clearTimeout(timeout);	}, []);	// ...}function App() {	// ...	useEffect(() => {		const timeout = setInterval(() => {			setSecondsLeft((v) => {				if (v === 0) return v;				return v - 1;			});		}, 1000);		return () => clearInterval(timeout);	}, []);	// ...}

When we add a mounted lifecycle to Angular, we:

  • Import OnInit
  • Add OnInit to the component's implements keyword
  • Add ngOnInit method to the component

To add an unmounted lifecycle method to an Angular component, we do the same steps as above, but with OnDestroy instead:

import { Component, OnDestroy } from "@angular/core";@Component({	selector: "cleanup-comp",	standalone: true,	template: `<p>Unmount me to see an alert</p>`,})class CleanupComponent implements OnDestroy {	ngOnDestroy() {		alert("I am cleaning up");	}}

Let's apply this new lifecycle method to our code sample previously:

@Component({	selector: "alarm-screen",	standalone: true,	// ...})class AlarmScreenComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy {	// ...	timeout: number | undefined = undefined;	ngOnInit() {		this.timeout = setTimeout(() => {			if (this.secondsLeft === 0) return;			this.secondsLeft = this.secondsLeft - 1;		}, 1000);	}	ngOnDestroy() {		clearTimeout(this.timeout);	}	// ...}@Component({	selector: "app-root",	standalone: true,	// ...})class AppComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy {	// ...	interval: number | undefined = undefined;	ngOnInit() {		this.interval = setInterval(() => {			if (this.secondsLeft === 0) return;			this.secondsLeft = this.secondsLeft - 1;		}, 1000);	}	ngOnDestroy() {		clearInterval(this.interval);	}	// ...}

Similar to how we import onMounted, we can import onUnmounted in Vue to run the relevant lifecycle method.

<!-- Cleanup.vue --><script setup>import { onUnmounted } from "vue";onUnmounted(() => {	alert("I am cleaning up");});</script><template>	<p>Unmount me to see an alert</p></template>

Let's apply this new lifecycle method to our code sample previously:

<!-- AlarmScreen.vue --><script setup>import { ref, onMounted, onUnmounted } from "vue";const emit = defineEmits(["snooze", "disable"]);// We don't need to wrap this in `ref`, since it won't be used in `template`let timeout;onMounted(() => {	timeout = setTimeout(() => {		// Automatically snooze the alarm		// after 10 seconds of inactivity		// In production, this would be 10 minutes		emit("snooze");	}, 10 * 1000);});onUnmounted(() => {	clearTimeout(timeout);});</script><template>	<!-- ... --></template>
<!-- App.vue --><script setup>import AlarmScreen from "./AlarmScreen.vue";import { ref, onMounted, onUnmounted } from "vue";// We don't need to wrap this in `ref`, since it won't be used in `template`let interval;onMounted(() => {	interval = setInterval(() => {		if (secondsLeft.value === 0) return;		secondsLeft.value = secondsLeft.value - 1;	}, 1000);});onUnmounted(() => {	clearInterval(interval);});// ...</script><template>	<!-- ... --></template>
Vue's watchEffect Cleanup

As mentioned previously, Vue has two methods of handling side effects; Lifecycle methods and watchEffect. Luckily, watchEffect also has the ability to clean up side effects that were created before.

To clean up an effect, watchEffect provides an argument to the inner watchEffect function, which we'll name onCleanup. This property is, in itself, a function that we call with the cleanup logic:

// onCleanup is a property passed to the inner `watchEffect` functionwatchEffect((onCleanup) => {	const interval = setInterval(() => {		console.log("Hello!");	}, 1000);	// We then call `onCleanup` with the expected cleaning behavior	onCleanup(() => {		clearInterval(interval);	});});

Let's rewrite the previous code samples to use watchEffect:

<!-- App.vue --><script setup>import AlarmScreen from "./AlarmScreen.vue";import { ref, watchEffect } from "vue";const secondsLeft = ref(5);const timerEnabled = ref(true);watchEffect((onCleanup) => {	const interval = setInterval(() => {		if (secondsLeft.value === 0) return;		secondsLeft.value = secondsLeft.value - 1;	}, 1000);	onCleanup(() => {		clearInterval(interval);	});});const snooze = () => {	secondsLeft.value = secondsLeft.value + 5;};const disable = () => {	timerEnabled.value = false;};</script><template>	<p v-if="!timerEnabled">There is no timer</p>	<AlarmScreen		v-else-if="secondsLeft === 0"		@snooze="snooze()"		@disable="disable()"	/>	<p v-else>{{ secondsLeft }} seconds left in timer</p></template>
<!-- AlarmScreen.vue --><script setup>import { ref, watchEffect } from "vue";const emit = defineEmits(["snooze", "disable"]);watchEffect((onCleanup) => {	const timeout = setTimeout(() => {		// Automatically snooze the alarm		// after 10 seconds of inactivity		// In production, this would be 10 minutes		emit("snooze");	}, 10 * 1000);	onCleanup(() => clearTimeout(timeout));});</script><template>	<div>		<p>Time to wake up!</p>		<button @click="emit('snooze')">Snooze for 5 seconds</button>		<button @click="emit('disable')">Turn off alarm</button>	</div></template>

Hidden Memory Leaks

While we've quickly glanced at how each framework is able to clean up its side effects using a side effect handler that runs when a component unmounts, we haven't seen how this impacts other aspects of a component yet.

For example, we mentioned in the first chapter that you can emit events from a child component into a parent component. Let's build out a component that uses events to trigger a parent function a second after its contents are shown.

Let's not yet introduce cleanup, you'll see why in a second.

React isn't able to emit an event from a child component to a parent component without passing a function down from the parent to the child:

const Child = ({ fn }) => {	// ...};const Parent = () => {	const fn = () => {		// ...	};	return <Child fn={fn} />;};

However, this is not the same thing as emitting an event in Angular or Vue. We'll take a look at why that is and how it relates to a component unmounting shortly.

@Component({	selector: "app-alert",	standalone: true,	template: ` <p>Showing alert...</p> `,})class AlertComponent implements OnInit {	@Output() alert = new EventEmitter();	ngOnInit() {		// Notice that we don't clean up this side effect		setTimeout(() => {			this.alert.emit();		}, 1000);	}}@Component({	selector: "app-root",	standalone: true,	imports: [AlertComponent],	template: `		<div>			<!-- Try clicking and unclicking quickly -->			<button (click)="toggle()">Toggle</button>			<!-- Binding to an event -->			@if (show) {				<app-alert (alert)="alertUser()" />			}		</div>	`,})class AppComponent {	show = false;	toggle() {		this.show = !this.show;	}	alertUser() {		alert("I am an alert!");	}}
<!-- Alert.vue --><script setup>import { onMounted } from "vue";const emit = defineEmits(["alert"]);onMounted(() => {	setTimeout(() => {		emit("alert");	}, 1000);});</script><template>	<p>Showing alert...</p></template>
<!-- App.vue --><script setup>import { ref } from "vue";import Alert from "./Alert.vue";const show = ref(false);const toggle = () => (show.value = !show.value);const alertUser = () => alert("I am an alert!");</script><template>	<div>		<!-- Try clicking and unclicking quickly -->		<button @click="toggle()">Toggle</button>		<!-- Binding to an event -->		<Alert v-if="show" @alert="alertUser()" />	</div></template>

Now, if we run one of our code samples and click on a button rapidly and repeatedly, we get... Nothing! Only the last alert will show up to notify you that our Alert component has been rendered.

That's strange... I thought that our setTimeout would still trigger because we haven't cleaned it up using a clearTimeout.

You're right! The setTimeout does trigger! You can verify this by updating our setTimeout to include a console.log inside of it.

Then why isn't our alert being triggered?

Well, when you think about how a component in one of these frameworks works, you might visualize them akin to this:

A component declaration is at the bottom. Two component instances stem from that declaration and then bind to the DOM and Framework root

Here, we can see that despite there being one component declaration:

const Comp = () => {	const obj = {};	return <p>Hello, world</p>;};
@Component({	standalone: true,	selector: "app-comp",	template: `<p>Hello, world</p>`,})class CompComponent {	obj = {};}
<!-- Comp.vue --><script setup>const obj = {};</script><template>	<p>Hello, world</p></template>

Every time we use this component:

const App = () => {	return <div>		<!-- One: -->		<Comp />		<!-- Two: -->		<Comp />	</div>}
@Component({	standalone: true,	imports: [CompComponent],	selector: "app-root",	template: `		<div>			<!-- One: -->			<app-comp />			<!-- Two: -->			<app-comp />		</div>	`,})class AppComponent {}
<!-- App.vue --><script setup>import Comp from "./Comp.vue";</script><template>	<div>		<!-- One: -->		<Comp />		<!-- Two: -->		<Comp />	</div></template>

Each of the individual Comp usages generates a component instance. These instances have their own separate memory usage, which allows you to control the state from them both independently of one another.

Moreover, though, because each component instance has its own connection to the framework root instance, it can do some cleanup of event listeners when an instance is detached without impacting other instances:

When a component is unmounted, it disconnects the event and input handlers from the framework

So if the framework events are cleaned up for us, why do we need to handle and cleanup side effects manually?

Well, as we showed, our setTimeout in our example isn't cleaned up even though the emit output from the parent is. This means that if you have long-standing code (say, a useInterval instead of a setTimeout), you'll not release that part of the memory back to JavaScript's internal cleanup.

That's the definition of a memory leak: Not allowing the language to clean up old code. Eventually, over time, you may even hit an "out of memory" error, where your computer can no longer run your app or site without resetting itself.

Have the feeling you're missing something? Some of this section requires pre-existing knowledge about how computer memory works both in hardware land and how JavaScript handles memory under-the-hood. It's suggested to read these resources and come back if you're feeling confused.

Seeing Hidden Memory Leaks

Not only are the memory leaks we mentioned hidden from the user when using events, but there are ways to accidentally expose them to your user as well.

The easiest way to do this is to switch away from an event handler and towards a function being passed from the parent to the child:

const Alert = ({ alert }) => {	useEffect(() => {		setTimeout(() => {			alert();		}, 1000);	});	return <p>Showing alert...</p>;};const App = () => {	const [show, setShow] = useState(false);	const alertUser = () => alert("I am an alert!");	return (		<>			<button onClick={() => setShow(!show)}>Toggle</button>			{show && <Alert alert={alertUser} />}		</>	);};
@Component({	selector: "app-alert",	standalone: true,	template: ` <p>Showing alert...</p> `,})class AlertComponent implements OnInit {	@Input() alert!: () => void;	ngOnInit() {		setTimeout(() => {			this.alert();		}, 1000);	}}@Component({	selector: "app-root",	standalone: true,	imports: [AlertComponent],	template: `		<button (click)="toggle()">Toggle</button>		@if (show) {			<app-alert [alert]="alertUser" />		}	`,})class AppComponent {	show = false;	toggle() {		this.show = !this.show;	}	alertUser() {		alert("I am an alert!");	}}
<!-- Alert.vue --><script setup>import { onMounted } from "vue";const props = defineProps(["alert"]);onMounted(() => {	setTimeout(() => {		props.alert?.();	}, 1000);});</script><template>	<p>Showing alert...</p></template>
<!-- App.vue --><script setup>import { ref } from "vue";import Alert from "./Alert.vue";const show = ref(false);const toggle = () => (show.value = !show.value);const alertUser = () => alert("I am an alert!");</script><template>	<!-- Try clicking and unclicking quickly -->	<button @click="toggle()">Toggle</button>	<!-- Passing a function -->	<Alert v-if="show" :alert="alertUser" /></template>

Now if we click the "Toggle" button rapidly, you'll end up with multiple alerts back-to-back, as many times as you toggled the Alert component. Your hidden memory leak is now visible to the user! 😱

Why does this behavior differ from listening for an event from the parent?

Well, let's look at our old example visually once again:

Inputs are being passed from a component instance to the DOM and framework root that's then stored in memory

You may notice that instead of a two-way binding, we're now passing a function reference from the component instance to the framework and DOM. As a result of this passing (rather than listening), our framework of choice no longer has the ability to forcibly invalidate this reference. After all, a function in JavaScript is just a value that can be passed like any other.

This shift in how we're handling a parent's data (binding vs. getting a reference) means that on cleanup, the function passed to a child will not become invalid. Instead, it will persist in memory until it's no longer needed by the child component and cleaned up by JavaScript's internals:

When the component unmounts, our inputs are persisted in memory of the DOM

This is why it's so important to clean up memory — it's easy to let it become leaky and accidentally shift the user's expected behavior.

Cleaning up Event Listeners

We had a code sample earlier in the chapter that relied on addEventListener to get the window size. This code sample, you may have guessed, had a memory leak in it because we never cleaned up this event listener.

To clean up an event listener, we must remove its reference from the window object via removeEventListener:

const fn = () => console.log("a");window.addEventListener("resize", fn);window.removeEventListener("resize", fn);

Something to keep in mind with removeEventListener is that it needs to be the same function passed as the second argument to remove it from the listener.

This means that inline arrow functions like this:

window.addEventListener("resize", () => console.log("a"));window.removeEventListener("resize", () => console.log("a"));

Won't work, but the following will:

const fn = () => console.log("a");window.addEventListener("resize", fn);window.removeEventListener("resize", fn);

Let's fix our WindowSize component from before by cleaning up the event listener side effect using the knowledge we have now.

const WindowSize = () => {	const [height, setHeight] = useState(window.innerHeight);	const [width, setWidth] = useState(window.innerWidth);	useEffect(() => {		function resizeHandler() {			setHeight(window.innerHeight);			setWidth(window.innerWidth);		}		window.addEventListener("resize", resizeHandler);		return () => window.removeEventListener("resize", resizeHandler);	}, []);	return (		<div>			<p>Height: {height}</p>			<p>Width: {width}</p>		</div>	);};
@Component({	selector: "window-size",	standalone: true,	template: `		<div>			<p>Height: {{ height }}</p>			<p>Width: {{ width }}</p>		</div>	`,})class WindowSizeComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy {	height = window.innerHeight;	width = window.innerWidth;	// This must be an arrow function, see below for more	resizeHandler = () => {		this.height = window.innerHeight;		this.width = window.innerWidth;	};	ngOnInit() {		window.addEventListener("resize", this.resizeHandler);	}	ngOnDestroy() {		window.removeEventListener("resize", this.resizeHandler);	}}

Here, we're making sure to use an arrow function for resizeHandler in order to make sure that removeEventListener works as expected.

To learn more about why that is, read this article I wrote about this topic.

Using lifecycles, this would be:

<!-- WindowSize.vue --><script setup>import { ref, onMounted, onUnmounted } from "vue";const height = ref(window.innerHeight);const width = ref(window.innerWidth);function resizeHandler() {	height.value = window.innerHeight;	width.value = window.innerWidth;}onMounted(() => {	window.addEventListener("resize", resizeHandler);});onUnmounted(() => {	window.removeEventListener("resize", resizeHandler);});</script><template>	<div>		<p>Height: {{ height }}</p>		<p>Width: {{ width }}</p>	</div></template>

Or, using watchEffect, this is:

<!-- WindowSize.vue --><script setup>import { ref, watchEffect } from "vue";const height = ref(window.innerHeight);const width = ref(window.innerWidth);function resizeHandler() {	height.value = window.innerHeight;	width.value = window.innerWidth;}watchEffect((onCleanup) => {	window.addEventListener("resize", resizeHandler);	onCleanup(() => window.removeEventListener("resize", resizeHandler));});</script><template>	<div>		<p>Height: {{ height }}</p>		<p>Width: {{ width }}</p>	</div></template>

Ensuring Side Effect Cleanup

Some frameworks have taken extra steps to ensure your side effects are always cleaned up.

When React 16.3 came out, it introduced a new component called StrictMode.

StrictMode was developed to help warn developers of potential problems that lie dormant in their applications. It's commonly enabled in most production codebases and is used at the root of the app like so:

import { StrictMode } from "react";import { createRoot } from "react-dom/client";const App = () => {	// ...};createRoot(document.getElementById("root")).render(	<StrictMode>		<App />	</StrictMode>,);

Specifically, StrictMode helps find issues with:

  • Unsafe Hooks usage
  • Legacy API usage
  • Unexpected side effects

It does so by modifying slight behaviors of your app and printing errors when needed.

StrictMode only does this on development builds of your app and does not impact your code whatsoever during production.

Since React 18, StrictMode will re-run all useEffects twice. This change was made by the React team to highlight potential bugs in your application that are caused by uncleaned side effects.

So, if you have the following code:

let i = 0;const App = () => {	useEffect(() => {		alert(`I am rendering. Counter: ${++i}`);	}, []);	// ...};createRoot(document.getElementById("root")).render(	<StrictMode>		<App />	</StrictMode>,);

You'd see two alerts when the component renders:

  1. I am rendering. Counter: 1
  2. I am rendering. Counter: 2

However, if you disable StrictMode your output will be:

  1. I am rendering. Counter: 1

Again, this is intentional. React is trying to help you find bugs in your code by highlighting side effects that are not cleaned up.

If you have code that does not work with StrictMode, this is most likely the culprit, and you should investigate all side effect cleanups in your components.

Angular does not have any special behaviors with OnInit to force component cleanup. React, however, does.

Vue does not have any special behaviors with OnInit to force component cleanup. React, however, does.

Re-Renders

While rendering and un-rendering are the most frequent times you might want to add a side effect handler, they're not the only times you're able to do so.

While many of the examples we've shown before have been relatively consistent between each framework, this is where these frameworks tend to diverge. This difference occurs because the APIs exposed by each framework typically depend on how their internals function; this allows you to have more fine-grained control over your components.

While we'll touch on the framework's internals in the third book of the series, for now, let's take a look at one more component API that's relatively consistent between most frameworks: Re-rendering.

Re-rendering is what it sounds like; While the initial "render" is what allows us to see the first contents on screen being drawn, subsequent updates — like our live-updated values — are drawn during "re-renders."

Re-renders may occur for many reasons:

  • Props being updated
  • State being changed
  • Explicitly calling a re-render via other means

Let's take a look at how each framework exposes re-rendering to you.

Up until this point, we've only ever passed an empty array to useEffect:

useEffect(() => {	doSomething();	// This doesn't have to be an empty array}, []);

This empty array hints to React to "only run this side effect once: when the component is first rendered".

React may choose in specific instances, such as StrictMode, to ignore this hint. Because of this, useEffect's array should be treated as a performance optimization for React, not a steadfast rule.

Let's take a look at the inverse of this "never run this function again" React hint:

useEffect(() => {	doSomething();	// Notice no array});

Here, we're not passing an array to useEffect, which tells the framework that it can (and should) run the side effect on every single render, regardless of if said render has updated the DOM or not.

See, not every re-render of a component triggers an on-screen change. Some re-renders will update values and re-run the function body of a component but not update the screen.

While all renders have a state comparison step, like the one that occurs to validate if the useEffect array has changed, only renders that update the value on-screen have a "paint" step. This "paint" updates the values on-screen to the user.

Given this, the following code will re-render but not paint when the user clicks the button.

const ReRenderListener = () => {	const [_, updateState] = useState(0);	useEffect(() => {		console.log("Component has re-rendered");	}); // Notice the lack of an array	return <button onClick={() => updateState((v) => v + 1)}>Re-render</button>;};

Because the button triggers a re-render, useEffect will run, even if there is not a paint.

You may think we're done with useEffect now, but there's yet another usage for the passed array, which we'll touch on shortly.

We mentioned earlier that outside the basics of "rendering" and "un-rendering," each framework tends to diverge. Well, dear reader, it's coming into play here.

Angular does not have a lifecycle method specifically for when a component re-renders. This is because Angular does not track DOM changes internally the same way the other two frameworks do.

This isn't to say that Angular components don't re-draw the DOM — we've already demonstrated that it's able to live-refresh the DOM when data changes — just that Angular doesn't provide a lifecycle for detecting when it does.

To answer "why" this occurs is a much longer topic, which I've written about in a dedicated blog post. In the meantime, feel free to see how the other two frameworks work as a reference to what you might expect elsewhere.

<!-- ReRenderListener.vue --><script setup>import { ref, onUpdated } from "vue";const count = ref(0);const add = () => {	count.value++;};onUpdated(() => {	console.log("Component was painted");});</script><template>	<button @click="add()">{{ count }}</button></template>

Every time the ReRenderListener component updates the DOM with new changes, the onUpdated method will run.

In-Component Property Side Effects

Up to this point, we've looked at component-wide events such as "rendering the component" and "unrendering the component."

While these events are undeniably helpful to hook into, most user input doesn't cause this drastic of a change.

For example, let's say we wanted to update the browser tab's title when we select a new document:

const App = () => {	const [title, setTitle] = useState("Movies");	return (		<div>			<button onClick={() => setTitle("Movies")}>Movies</button>			<button onClick={() => setTitle("Music")}>Music</button>			<button onClick={() => setTitle("Documents")}>Documents</button>			<p>{title}</p>		</div>	);};
@Component({	selector: "app-root",	standalone: true,	template: `		<div>			<button (click)="title = 'Movies'">Movies</button>			<button (click)="title = 'Music'">Music</button>			<button (click)="title = 'Documents'">Documents</button>			<p>{{ title }}</p>		</div>	`,})class AppComponent {	title = "Movies";}
<!-- App.vue --><script setup>import { ref, watchEffect } from "vue";const title = ref("Movies");</script><template>	<div>		<button @click="title = 'Movies'">Movies</button>		<button @click="title = 'Music'">Music</button>		<button @click="title = 'Documents'">Documents</button>		<p>{{ title }}</p>	</div></template>

Here, title is a variable that is being updated, which triggers a re-render. Because the framework knows how to trigger a re-render based on a reactive change, it also has the ability to trigger a side effect whenever a value is changed.

Let's see how we do this in React, Angular, and Vue:

Earlier in the chapter, we looked at how an empty array passed to useEffect hints to React that you only want the inner function running once. We also saw how passing no array will cause useEffect's function to run in every re-render.

These are two ends of an extreme; the middle-ground comes in the form of passing specific functions to your useEffect:

const App = () => {	const [title, setTitle] = useState("Movies");	useEffect(() => {		document.title = title;		// Ask React to only run this `useEffect` if `title` has changed	}, [title]);	return (		<div>			<button onClick={() => setTitle("Movies")}>Movies</button>			<button onClick={() => setTitle("Music")}>Music</button>			<button onClick={() => setTitle("Documents")}>Documents</button>			<p>{title}</p>		</div>	);};

By doing this, we're hinting to React that this side effect should only ever run when the test variable's reference has changed during a render.

Stale Values

When using a component's variables within useEffect, it's absolutely imperative that we include all the variables within the useEffect array.

This is because any variables left outside of useEffect will likely result in "stale" data.

"Stale" data is any data out-of-date from the "true"/intended value. This occurs when you pass data to a function inside a "closure" and do not update the value later.

Take the following code sample:

function App() {	const [count, setCount] = useState(0);	useEffect(() => {		const interval = setInterval(() => {			console.log("Count is: " + count);		}, 1000);		return () => clearInterval(interval);	}, []);	return (		<div>			{count}			<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>Add</button>		</div>	);}

Here, we're telling React to console.log the count value every second inside a setInterval.

However, because we're not passing count to the useEffect array, the console.log will never show any value other than:

"Count is: 0";

This is because our useEffect has a "stale" value of count and React is never telling the function to update with the new count value.

To solve this, we can add count to the useEffect array:

useEffect(() => {	const interval = setInterval(() => {		console.log("Count is: " + count);	}, 1000);	return () => clearInterval(interval);}, [count]);

Today, Angular does not include a method for tracking internal state changes. However, a future version of Angular will introduce the concept of "Signals", which will allow us to watch changes made to a variable, regardless of where the state change comes from.

Instead, we'll have to use a setTitle function that calls the variable mutation as well as sets the document.title as a side effect:

@Component({	selector: "app-root",	standalone: true,	template: `		<div>			<button (click)="title = setTitles('Movies')">Movies</button>			<button (click)="title = setTitles('Music')">Music</button>			<button (click)="title = setTitles('Documents')">Documents</button>			<p>{{ title }}</p>		</div>	`,})class AppComponent {	setTitles(val: string) {		document.title = val;		return val;	}	title = this.setTitles("Movies");}

I have to come clean about something: watchEffect isn't primarily used to run an effect on a component's first render, as we've been using it to this point.

Instead, watchEffect does something pretty magical: It re-runs the inner function whenever a "tracked" ref is updated:

<!-- App.vue --><script setup>import { ref, watchEffect } from "vue";const title = ref("Movies");// watchEffect will re-run whenever `title.value` is updatedwatchEffect(() => {	document.title = title.value;});</script><template>	<div>		<button @click="title = 'Movies'">Movies</button>		<button @click="title = 'Music'">Music</button>		<button @click="title = 'Documents'">Documents</button>		<p>{{ title }}</p>	</div></template>

How does watchEffect know what refs to watch? The long answer dives deep into Vue's source code and is a challenge to introduce at this stage.

The short answer is "Vue's ref code contains a bit of logic inside it to register to the nearest watchEffect, but only when ref is inside a synchronous operation."

This means that if we have the following code:

const title = ref("Movies");const count = ref(0);// watchEffect will re-run whenever `title.value` or `count.value` is updatedwatchEffect(() => {	console.log(count.value);	document.title = "Title is " + title.value + " and count is " + count.value;});

The watchEffect will run whenever title or count is updated. However, if we do the following:

const title = ref("Movies");const count = ref(0);// watchEffect will re-run only when `count.value` is updatedwatchEffect(() => {	console.log(count.value);	// This is an async operation, inner `ref` usage won't be tracked	setTimeout(() => {		document.title = "Title is " + title.value + " and count is " + count.value;	}, 0);});

It will only track changes to count, as the title.value usage is inside an async operation.

Manually Track Changes with watch

watchEffect is a bit magic, aye? Maybe it's a bit too much for your needs, maybe you need to be more specific about what you do and do not track. This is where Vue's watch function comes into play.

While watchEffect seemingly magically detects what variables to listen to, watch requires you to be explicit about what properties to listen for changes on:

import { ref, watch } from "vue";const title = ref("Movies");watch(	// Only listen for changes to `title`, despite what's in the function body	title,	() => {		document.title = title.value;	},	{ immediate: true },);

You may notice that we're passing {immediate: true} as the options for the watch; what is that doing?

Well, by default watch only runs after the first render. This means that the initial state of title would otherwise not trigger the document.title update.

For example:

watch(title, () => {	document.title = title.value;});

Would still run the inner function when title has changed, but only after the initial render.

watch Multiple Items

To watch multiple items, we can pass an array of reactive variables:

const title = ref("Movies");const count = ref(0);// This will run when `title` and `count` are updated, despite async usagewatch(	[title, count],	() => {		setTimeout(() => {			document.title =				"Title is " + title.value + " and count is " + count.value;		}, 0);	},	{ immediate: true },);

watch also supports passing an onCleanup method to clean up watched side effects, much like the watchEffect API:

const title = ref("Movies");const count = ref(0);// This will run when `title` and `count` are updated, despite async usagewatch([title, count], (currentValue, previousValue, onCleanup) => {	const timeout = setTimeout(() => {		document.title = "Title is " + title.value + " and count is " + count.value;	}, 1000);	onCleanup(() => clearTimeout(timeout));});

Rendering, Committing, Painting

While we might attribute the definition of "rendering" to mean "showing something new on-screen," this is only partially true. While Angular follows this definition to some degree, React and Vue do not.

Instead, React and Vue both have a trick up their sleeves; the virtual DOM (VDOM). While explaining the VDOM is a bit complex, here's the basics:

  • The framework mirrors the nodes in the DOM tree so that it can recreate the entire app's UI at any given moment.

  • When you tell the framework to update the value on the screen, it tries to figure out the specific part of the screen to render and nothing more.

  • After the framework has decided specifically which elements it wants to re-render with new contents, it will:

    1. Create a set of instructions that are needed to run to update the DOM
    2. Run those instructions on the VDOM
    3. Reflect the changes made in VDOM on the actual browser DOM
    4. The browser then takes the updates made to the DOM and shows them to the user

Let's pause on these four steps of the last bullet point here. This process of deciding which elements the framework needs to update is called "reconciliation." This reconciliation step has three parts to it and are named respectively:

  1. Diffing
  2. Pre-committing
  3. Committing
  4. Painting
A user's change will trigger diffing, which will pre-commit the updated components on the VDOM, which will commit the changes to the DOM, which will then paint the changes on-screen

Keep in mind, this "reconciliation" process occurs as part of a render. Your component may render due to reactive state changes, but may not trigger the entire reconciliation process if it detects nothing has changed during the diffing stage.

React and Vue both provide a way to access internal stages of reconciliation with their own APIs.

Early in this article, we mentioned there were two ways of handling side effects in React: useEffect and useLayoutEffect. While we've sufficiently covered the usage of useEffect, we haven't yet explored useLayoutEffect.

There are two big differences between useEffect and useLayoutEffect:

  1. While useEffect runs after a component's paint, useLayoutEffect occurs before the component's paint but after** a component's commit phase.
  2. useLayoutEffect blocks the browser, which useEffect does not.

If useLayoutEffect only ran prior to the browser's paint, it might be acceptable to use it more frequently. However, because it does block the browser from painting, it should only be used in very specific circumstances.

For example, let's say you want to measure the size of an HTML element and display that information as part of the UI; you'd want to use useLayoutEffect instead of useEffect, as otherwise, it would flash the contents on screen momentarily before the component re-rendered to hide the initialization data.

Let's use useLayoutEffect to calculate the bounding box of an element to position another element:

import { useState, useLayoutEffect } from "react";function App() {	const [num, setNum] = useState(10);	const [bounding, setBounding] = useState({		left: 0,		right: 0,		top: 0,		bottom: 0,		height: 0,	});	// This runs before the DOM paints	useLayoutEffect(() => {		// This should be using a `ref`. More on that in a future chapter		const el = document.querySelector("#number");		const b = el?.getBoundingClientRect();		setBounding(b);	}, [num]);	return (		<div>			<input				type="number"				value={num}				onChange={(e) => setNum(e.target.valueAsNumber || "0")}			/>			<div style={{ display: "flex", justifyContent: "flex-end" }}>				<h1 id="number" style={{ display: "inline-block" }}>					{num}				</h1>			</div>			<h1				style={{					position: "absolute",					left: bounding.left,					top: bounding.top + bounding.height,				}}			>				^			</h1>		</div>	);}

While the initial value is set to 10 with an arrow pointing to the 1, if we change this value to 1000, it will move the arrow underneath the 1, without flashing an instance of the arrow not facing the 1:

An uptick symbol facing the 1 in a number of 1000 painted in the DOM

Because Angular does not use a virtual DOM, it does not have a method to detect specific parts of the reconciliation process.

We've been using watch and watchEffect throughout the course of this chapter, primarily as a means to listen to global events of some kind.

However, what if we wanted to localize our side effects to an element on-screen as part of a component's child? Let's try it:

<!-- App.vue --><script setup>import { ref, watch } from "vue";const title = ref("Movies");watch(	title,	() => {		const el = document.querySelector("#title-paragraph");		alert(el?.innerText);	},	{ immediate: true },);</script><template>	<div>		<button @click="title = 'Movies'">Movies</button>		<button @click="title = 'Music'">Music</button>		<button @click="title = 'Documents'">Documents</button>		<p id="title-paragraph">{{ title }}</p>	</div></template>

Here, when we click any of the buttons to trigger a title change, you may notice that it shows the previous value of the element's innerText. For example, when we press "Music", it shows the innerText of Movies, which was the previous value of title.

That doesn't seem to follow the behavior we're looking for!

There's another hint that things aren't working as-expected either; on the first immediate run of watch

Why is this happening?

See, by default, both watch and watchEffect run before the DOM's contents have been committed from Vue's VDOM.

To change this behavior, we can add {flush: 'post'} to either watch or watchEffect to run the watcher's function after the DOM commit phase.

watch(	title,	() => {		const el = document.querySelector("#title-paragraph");		alert(el?.innerText);	},	{ immediate: true, flush: "post" },);

Now, when we click on an item, it will print out the current version of title for the element's innerText.

While this level of internals knowledge is seldom used when getting started building applications, it can provide you the powerful ability to optimize and improve your applications; think of this information as your developer superpower.

Like any other superpower, you should use these last few APIs with care, knowing that they may make your application worse rather than better; With great APIs comes great responsibility.

Changing Data without Renderings

Sometimes, it's not ideal to trigger a re-render every time you want to set a variable's state.

For example, let's go back to our document.title example. Say that instead of updating the title and document.title right away, we want to delay the updating of both using a setTimeout:

const TitleChanger = () => {	const [title, setTitle] = useState("Movies");	function updateTitle(val) {		const timeout = setTimeout(() => {			setTitle(val);			document.title = val;		}, 5000);	}	return (		<div>			<button onClick={() => updateTitle("Movies")}>Movies</button>			<button onClick={() => updateTitle("Music")}>Music</button>			<button onClick={() => updateTitle("Documents")}>Documents</button>			<p>{title}</p>		</div>	);};
@Component({	selector: "title-changer",	standalone: true,	template: `		<div>			<button (click)="updateTitle('Movies')">Movies</button>			<button (click)="updateTitle('Music')">Music</button>			<button (click)="updateTitle('Documents')">Documents</button>			<p>{{ title }}</p>		</div>	`,})export class TitleChangerComponent {	title = "Movies";	updateTitle(val: string) {		setTimeout(() => {			this.title = val;			document.title = val;		}, 5000);	}}
<!-- TitleChanger.vue --><script setup>import { ref } from "vue";const title = ref("Movies");function updateTitle(val) {	setTimeout(() => {		title.value = val;		document.title = val;	}, 5000);}</script><template>	<div>		<button @click="updateTitle('Movies')">Movies</button>		<button @click="updateTitle('Music')">Music</button>		<button @click="updateTitle('Documents')">Documents</button>		<p>{{ title }}</p>	</div></template>

If we click one of these buttons and un-render the App component, our setTimeout will still execute because we've never told this component to cancel the timeout.

We could solve this problem using a stateful variable:

const TitleChanger = () => {	const [title, setTitle] = useState("Movies");	const [timeoutExpire, setTimeoutExpire] = useState(null);	function updateTitle(val) {		clearTimeout(timeoutExpire);		const timeout = setTimeout(() => {			setTitle(val);			document.title = val;		}, 5000);		setTimeoutExpire(timeout);	}	useEffect(() => {		return () => clearTimeout(timeoutExpire);	}, [timeoutExpire]);	return (		<div>			<button onClick={() => updateTitle("Movies")}>Movies</button>			<button onClick={() => updateTitle("Music")}>Music</button>			<button onClick={() => updateTitle("Documents")}>Documents</button>			<p>{title}</p>		</div>	);};
@Component({	selector: "title-changer",	standalone: true,	template: `		<div>			<button (click)="updateTitle('Movies')">Movies</button>			<button (click)="updateTitle('Music')">Music</button>			<button (click)="updateTitle('Documents')">Documents</button>			<p>{{ title }}</p>		</div>	`,})export class TitleChangerComponent implements OnDestroy {	title = "Movies";	timeoutExpire: any = null;	updateTitle(val: string) {		clearTimeout(this.timeoutExpire);		this.timeoutExpire = setTimeout(() => {			this.title = val;			document.title = val;		}, 5000);	}	ngOnDestroy() {		clearTimeout(this.timeoutExpire);	}}
<!-- TitleChanger.vue --><script setup>import { ref, onUnmounted } from "vue";const title = ref("Movies");const timeoutExpire = ref(null);function updateTitle(val) {	clearTimeout(timeoutExpire.value);	timeoutExpire.value = setTimeout(() => {		title.value = val;		document.title = val;	}, 5000);}onUnmounted(() => clearTimeout(timeoutExpire.value));</script><template>	<div>		<button @click="updateTitle('Movies')">Movies</button>		<button @click="updateTitle('Music')">Music</button>		<button @click="updateTitle('Documents')">Documents</button>		<p>{{ title }}</p>	</div></template>

This will trigger a re-render of App when we run updateTitle. This re-render will not display any new changes since our timeoutExpire property is not used in the DOM but may be computationally expensive depending on the size of your App component.

Luckily for us, each framework has the ability to sidestep a render while persisting a value in a component's state.

To store a variable's state in a React function component without triggering a re-render, we can use a useRef hook to store our setTimeout return without triggering a re-render:

import { useState, useRef, useEffect } from "react";const TitleChanger = () => {	const [title, setTitle] = useState("Movies");	const timeoutExpire = useRef(null);	function updateTitle(val) {		timeoutExpire.current = setTimeout(() => {			setTitle(val);			document.title = val;		}, 5000);	}	useEffect(() => {		return () => clearTimeout(timeoutExpire.current);	}, [timeoutExpire]);	return (		<div>			<button onClick={() => updateTitle("Movies")}>Movies</button>			<button onClick={() => updateTitle("Music")}>Music</button>			<button onClick={() => updateTitle("Documents")}>Documents</button>			<p>{title}</p>		</div>	);};

useRef allows you to persist data across renders, similar to useState. There are two major differences from useState:

  1. You access data from a ref using .current
  2. It does not trigger a re-render when updating values (more on that soon)

This makes useRef perfect for things like setTimeout and setInterval returned values; they need to be persisted to clean up properly but do not need to be displayed to the user, so we can avoid re-rendering.

useRefs Don't Trigger useEffects

Because useRef doesn't trigger a re-render, our useEffect will never re-run; useEffect doesn't listen to the passed array values but rather checks the reference of the array's value.

What does this mean?

Take the following JavaScript:

const obj1 = { updated: false };const obj2 = obj1;obj1.updated = true;console.log("Is object 2 updated?", obj2.updated); // trueconsole.log("Is object 1 and 2 the same?", obj1 === obj2); // true

This code snippet demonstrates how you can mutate a variable's value without changing its underlying memory location.

I've written about this underlying concept in JavaScript; if the above is unfamiliar to you, I'd suggest reading through it.

The useRef hook is implemented under the hood similar to the following:

const useRef = (initialValue) => {	const [value, _] = useState({ current: initialValue });	return value;};

Because the updates to useRef do not trigger the second argument of useState, it mutates the underlying object rather than referentially changes the object, which would trigger a re-render.

Now, let's see how this fundamental change impacts our usage of useRef. Take the following code sample:

const Comp = () => {	const ref = useRef();	useEffect(() => {		ref.current = Date.now();	});	// First render won't have `ref.current` set	return <p>The current timestamp is: {ref.current}</p>;};

Why doesn't this show a timestamp?

This is because when you change ref it never causes a re-render, which then never re-draws the p.

Here, useRef is set to undefined and only updates after the initial render in the useEffect, which does not cause a re-render.

To solve this, we must set a useState to trigger a re-render.

const Comp = () => {	// Set initial value for first render	const ref = useRef(Date.now());	// We're not using the `_` value, just the `set` method to force a re-render	const [_, setForceRenderNum] = useState(0);	useEffect(() => {		ref.current = Date.now();	});	return (		<div>			{/* This value will only update when you press "check timestamp" */}			<p>The current timestamp is: {ref.current}</p>			<button onClick={() => setForceRenderNum((v) => v + 1)}>				Check timestamp			</button>		</div>	);};

Here, the timestamp display will never update until you press the button. Even then, however, useEffect will run after the render, meaning that the displayed timestamp will be from the previous occurrence of the button press.

I wrote more about why we shouldn't use useRef in useEffects and when and where they're more useful in another article linked here.

While writing this book, dear reader, I had a few goals. One of those goals was to not introduce an API without first explaining it. I am about to break this rule for the only time I'm aware of in this book. Please forgive me.

While the internals of how Angular is able to detect changes in values are complex, the simple answer is "It uses some magic in something called Zone.js to automatically detect when you change a value."

To sidestep this detection from Zone.js in Angular, you can tell the framework to run something "outside of Angular."

To do this, we need to use "Dependency Injection" to access Angular's internal NgZone reference and use the runOutsideAngular method:

import { Component, NgZone, OnDestroy, inject } from "@angular/core";@Component({	selector: "title-changer",	standalone: true,	template: `		<div>			<button (click)="updateTitle('Movies')">Movies</button>			<button (click)="updateTitle('Music')">Music</button>			<button (click)="updateTitle('Documents')">Documents</button>			<p>{{ title }}</p>		</div>	`,})export class TitleChangerComponent implements OnDestroy {	title = "Movies";	timeoutExpire: any = null;	// This is using "Dependency Injection" (chapter 11)	// To access Angular's internals and expose them to you	ngZone = inject(NgZone);	updateTitle(val: string) {		clearTimeout(this.timeoutExpire);		// Do not run this in runOutsideAngular, otherwise `title` will never update		const expire = setTimeout(() => {			this.title = val;			document.title = val;		}, 5000);		this.ngZone.runOutsideAngular(() => {			this.timeoutExpire = expire;		});	}	ngOnDestroy() {		clearTimeout(this.timeoutExpire);	}}

If inject seems magic to you, it might as well be. To explore how dependency injection works under-the-hood, check out chapter 11, which explores the topic.

Because Vue uses a script that only executes once per component run, we can rely on mutating the variable's value using the let variable keyword.

<!-- TitleChanger.vue --><script setup>import { watch, ref, onUnmounted } from "vue";const title = ref("Movies");let timeoutExpire = null;function updateTitle(val) {	clearTimeout(timeoutExpire);	timeoutExpire = setTimeout(() => {		title.value = val;		document.title = val;	}, 5000);}onUnmounted(() => clearTimeout(timeoutExpire));</script><template>	<div>		<button @click="updateTitle('Movies')">Movies</button>		<button @click="updateTitle('Music')">Music</button>		<button @click="updateTitle('Documents')">Documents</button>		<p>{{ title }}</p>	</div></template>

API Chart

Let's take a look visually at how each framework calls the relevant APIs we've touched on today:

On the main loop, the VDOM constructs, which calls useLayoutEffect's first run. Then, the component paints, which calls the first run of useEffect. Then, the component has rendered and can re-render (more on that soon). Then, when the component unrenders, useLayoutEffect cleans up, and then useEffect cleans up. During re-renders, the VDOM updates occur, which calls the previous useLayoutEffect cleanup, and then the useLayoutEffect again. Then, the DOM paints which triggers the previous useEffect cleanup and the new useEffect.
When a component renders, it will trigger ngOnInit. Then, when a prop changes, it triggers ngOnChanges. Finally, when it unrenders, it will call ngOnDestroy.

Because Vue has two different APIs, I made two charts for them.

Vue Lifecycle Methods
On the main loop, the VDOM constructs, which calls the beforeCreate lifecycle method. Then, the component paints and runs the create lifecycle method. Then, the components are rendered and can call updated lifecycle method on re-renders. The unmounted lifecycle runs during the component unrendering
Vue Watchers
On the main loop, the VDOM constructs which calls "{immediate: true}" watchers. Then the component paints which calls the "{immediate: true, flush: 'post'}" watchers. Then, the component has rendered and can re-render (more on that soon). Then, when the component unrenders, watchers clean up, then "{flush: 'post'}" watchers cleanup. During re-renders, the VDOM updates occur, which calls the previous watcher run cleanup, then the watchers again. Then the DOM paints which triggers the previous watchers "{flush: 'post'}" watchers cleanup and the new "{flush: 'post'}" watchers.

Challenge

Since the start of this book, we've been working on a storage app. While our mockups to this point have been using a light mode, which is an important default for all apps due to accessibility concerns, let's add in a dark mode for the app:

The previous mockup for dark mode that has inverted colors for dark mode

This can be done by using a combination of technologies:

  • A manual theme toggles with three options:
    • Light Mode
    • Inherit Mode from OS
    • Dark Mode
  • CSS variables
  • The browser's matchMedia API detects the operating system's theme.
  • Persist the user's theme selection with localstorage

Let's start by building out the theme toggle using our respective frameworks.

function DarkModeToggle() {	const [explicitTheme, setExplicitTheme] = React.useState("inherit");	return (		<div style={{ display: "flex", gap: "1rem" }}>			<label style={{ display: "inline-flex", flexDirection: "column" }}>				<div>Light</div>				<input					name="theme"					type="radio"					checked={explicitTheme === "light"}					onChange={() => setExplicitTheme("light")}				/>			</label>			<label style={{ display: "inline-flex", flexDirection: "column" }}>				<div>Inherit</div>				<input					name="theme"					type="radio"					checked={explicitTheme === "inherit"}					onChange={() => setExplicitTheme("inherit")}				/>			</label>			<label style={{ display: "inline-flex", flexDirection: "column" }}>				<div>Dark</div>				<input					name="theme"					type="radio"					checked={explicitTheme === "dark"}					onChange={() => setExplicitTheme("dark")}				/>			</label>		</div>	);}
@Component({	selector: "dark-mode-toggle",	standalone: true,	template: `		<div style="display: flex; gap: 1rem">			<label style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: column">				<div>Light</div>				<input					name="theme"					type="radio"					[checked]="explicitTheme === 'light'"					(change)="setExplicitTheme('light')"				/>			</label>			<label style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: column">				<div>Inherit</div>				<input					name="theme"					type="radio"					[checked]="explicitTheme === 'inherit'"					(change)="setExplicitTheme('inherit')"				/>			</label>			<label style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: column">				<div>Dark</div>				<input					name="theme"					type="radio"					[checked]="explicitTheme === 'dark'"					(change)="setExplicitTheme('dark')"				/>			</label>		</div>	`,})class DarkModeToggleComponent {	explicitTheme = "inherit";	setExplicitTheme(val: string) {		this.explicitTheme = val;	}}
<!-- DarkModeToggle.vue --><script setup>import { ref } from "vue";const explicitTheme = ref("inherit");</script><template>	<div style="display: flex; gap: 1rem">		<label style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: column">			<div>Light</div>			<input				name="theme"				type="radio"				:checked="explicitTheme === 'light'"				@change="explicitTheme = 'light'"			/>		</label>		<label style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: column">			<div>Inherit</div>			<input				name="theme"				type="radio"				:checked="explicitTheme === 'inherit'"				@change="explicitTheme = 'inherit'"			/>		</label>		<label style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: column">			<div>Dark</div>			<input				name="theme"				type="radio"				:checked="explicitTheme === 'dark'"				@change="explicitTheme = 'dark'"			/>		</label>	</div></template>

Now that we have this theme toggle let's make the dark mode work by using some CSS and a side effect handler to listen for changes to value:

function DarkModeToggle() {	const [explicitTheme, setExplicitTheme] = React.useState("inherit");	React.useEffect(() => {		document.documentElement.className = explicitTheme;	}, [explicitTheme]);	// ...}function App() {	return (		<div>			<DarkModeToggle />			<p style={{ color: "var(--primary)" }}>This text is blue</p>			<style				children={`        :root {          --primary: #1A42E5;        }                .dark {          background: #121926;          color: #D6E4FF;          --primary: #6694FF;        }      `}			/>		</div>	);}
import { Component, ViewEncapsulation } from "@angular/core";@Component({	selector: "dark-mode-toggle",	standalone: true,	// ...})class DarkModeToggleComponent {	explicitTheme = "inherit";	setExplicitTheme(val: string) {		this.explicitTheme = val;		document.documentElement.className = val;	}}@Component({	selector: "app-root",	standalone: true,	imports: [DarkModeToggleComponent],	// This allows our CSS to be global, rather than limited to the component	encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.None,	styles: [		`			:root {				--primary: #1a42e5;			}			.dark {				background: #121926;				color: #d6e4ff;				--primary: #6694ff;			}		`,	],	template: `		<div>			<dark-mode-toggle />			<p style="color: var(--primary)">This text is blue</p>		</div>	`,})class AppComponent {}
<!-- DarkModeToggle.vue --><script setup>import { ref, watch } from "vue";const explicitTheme = ref("inherit");watch(explicitTheme, () => {	document.documentElement.className = explicitTheme.value;});</script><template>	<!-- ... --></template>
<!-- App.vue --><script setup>import DarkModeToggle from "./DarkModeToggle.vue";</script><template>	<div>		<DarkModeToggle />		<p style="color: var(--primary)">This text is blue</p>	</div></template><style>:root {	--primary: #1a42e5;}.dark {	background: #121926;	color: #d6e4ff;	--primary: #6694ff;}</style>

Now, we can use the matchMedia API to add a check if the user's OS has changed its theme or not.

See, we can detect the user's preferred color theme by doing the following in JavaScript:

// If true, the user prefers dark modewindow.matchMedia("(prefers-color-scheme: dark)").matches;

We can even add a listener for when the user changes this preference real time by doing the following:

window	.matchMedia("(prefers-color-scheme: dark)")	.addEventListener("change", (e) => {		// If true, the user prefers dark mode		e.matches;	});

Now that we know the JavaScript API let's integrate it with our application:

const isOSDark = window.matchMedia("(prefers-color-scheme: dark)");function DarkModeToggle() {	const [explicitTheme, setExplicitTheme] = useState("inherit");	const [osTheme, setOSTheme] = useState(isOSDark.matches ? "dark" : "light");	useEffect(() => {		if (explicitTheme === "implicit") {			document.documentElement.className = osTheme;			return;		}		document.documentElement.className = explicitTheme;	}, [explicitTheme, osTheme]);	useEffect(() => {		const changeOSTheme = () => {			setOSTheme(isOSDark.matches ? "dark" : "light");		};		isOSDark.addEventListener("change", changeOSTheme);		return () => {			isOSDark.removeEventListener("change", changeOSTheme);		};	}, []);	// ...}
@Component({	selector: "dark-mode-toggle",	standalone: true,	// ...})class DarkModeToggleComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy {	explicitTheme = "inherit";	isOSDark = window.matchMedia("(prefers-color-scheme: dark)");	osTheme = this.isOSDark.matches ? "dark" : "light";	// Remember, this has to be an arrow function, not a method	changeOSTheme = () => {		this.setExplicitTheme(this.isOSDark.matches ? "dark" : "light");	};	ngOnInit() {		this.isOSDark.addEventListener("change", this.changeOSTheme);	}	ngOnDestroy() {		this.isOSDark.removeEventListener("change", this.changeOSTheme);	}	setExplicitTheme(val: string) {		this.explicitTheme = val;		if (val === "implicit") {			document.documentElement.className = val;			return;		}		document.documentElement.className = val;	}}
<!-- DarkModeToggle.vue --><script setup>import { ref, watch, onMounted, onUnmounted } from "vue";const explicitTheme = ref("inherit");watch(explicitTheme, () => {	if (explicitTheme.value === "implicit") {		document.documentElement.className = explicitTheme.value;		return;	}	document.documentElement.className = explicitTheme.value;});const isOSDark = window.matchMedia("(prefers-color-scheme: dark)");const changeOSTheme = () => {	explicitTheme.value = isOSDark.matches ? "dark" : "light";};onMounted(() => {	isOSDark.addEventListener("change", changeOSTheme);});onUnmounted(() => {	isOSDark.removeEventListener("change", changeOSTheme);});</script><template>	<!-- ... --></template>

Now when the user changes their operating system's dark mode settings, it will reflect through our website.

Finally, let's remember the preference the user selected in the manual toggle by using the browser's localstorage API. This API works like a JSON object that persists through multiple browser sessions. This means we can do the following in JavaScript:

// Will be `null` if nothing is definedconst car = localStorage.getItem("car");if (!car) localStorage.setItem("car", "Hatchback");

Let's integrate this in our DarkModeToggle component:

const isOSDark = window.matchMedia("(prefers-color-scheme: dark)");function DarkModeToggle() {	const [explicitTheme, setExplicitTheme] = useState(		localStorage.getItem("theme") || "inherit",	);	const [osTheme, setOSTheme] = useState(isOSDark.matches ? "dark" : "light");	useEffect(() => {		localStorage.setItem("theme", explicitTheme);	}, [explicitTheme]);	useEffect(() => {		if (explicitTheme === "implicit") {			document.documentElement.className = osTheme;			return;		}		document.documentElement.className = explicitTheme;	}, [explicitTheme, osTheme]);	useEffect(() => {		const changeOSTheme = () => {			setOSTheme(isOSDark.matches ? "dark" : "light");		};		isOSDark.addEventListener("change", changeOSTheme);		return () => {			isOSDark.removeEventListener("change", changeOSTheme);		};	}, []);	return (		<div style={{ display: "flex", gap: "1rem" }}>			<label style={{ display: "inline-flex", flexDirection: "column" }}>				<div>Light</div>				<input					name="theme"					type="radio"					checked={explicitTheme === "light"}					onChange={() => setExplicitTheme("light")}				/>			</label>			<label style={{ display: "inline-flex", flexDirection: "column" }}>				<div>Inherit</div>				<input					name="theme"					type="radio"					checked={explicitTheme === "inherit"}					onChange={() => setExplicitTheme("inherit")}				/>			</label>			<label style={{ display: "inline-flex", flexDirection: "column" }}>				<div>Dark</div>				<input					name="theme"					type="radio"					checked={explicitTheme === "dark"}					onChange={() => setExplicitTheme("dark")}				/>			</label>		</div>	);}function App() {	return (		<div>			<DarkModeToggle />			<p style={{ color: "var(--primary)" }}>This text is blue</p>			<style				children={`        :root {          --primary: #1A42E5;        }                .dark {          background: #121926;          color: #D6E4FF;          --primary: #6694FF;        }      `}			/>		</div>	);}
@Component({	selector: "dark-mode-toggle",	standalone: true,	template: `		<div style="display: flex; gap: 1rem">			<label style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: column">				<div>Light</div>				<input					name="theme"					type="radio"					[checked]="explicitTheme === 'light'"					(change)="setExplicitTheme('light')"				/>			</label>			<label style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: column">				<div>Inherit</div>				<input					name="theme"					type="radio"					[checked]="explicitTheme === 'inherit'"					(change)="setExplicitTheme('inherit')"				/>			</label>			<label style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: column">				<div>Dark</div>				<input					name="theme"					type="radio"					[checked]="explicitTheme === 'dark'"					(change)="setExplicitTheme('dark')"				/>			</label>		</div>	`,})class DarkModeToggleComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy {	explicitTheme = localStorage.getItem("theme") || "inherit";	isOSDark = window.matchMedia("(prefers-color-scheme: dark)");	osTheme = this.isOSDark.matches ? "dark" : "light";	// Remember, this has to be an arrow function, not a method	changeOSTheme = () => {		this.setExplicitTheme(this.isOSDark.matches ? "dark" : "light");	};	ngOnInit() {		this.isOSDark.addEventListener("change", this.changeOSTheme);	}	ngOnDestroy() {		this.isOSDark.removeEventListener("change", this.changeOSTheme);	}	setExplicitTheme(val: string) {		this.explicitTheme = val;		localStorage.setItem("theme", val);		if (val === "implicit") {			document.documentElement.className = val;			return;		}		document.documentElement.className = val;	}}@Component({	selector: "app-root",	standalone: true,	imports: [DarkModeToggleComponent],	// This allows our CSS to be global	encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.None,	styles: [		`			:root {				--primary: #1a42e5;			}			.dark {				background: #121926;				color: #d6e4ff;				--primary: #6694ff;			}		`,	],	template: `		<div>			<dark-mode-toggle />			<p style="color: var(--primary)">This text is blue</p>		</div>	`,})class AppComponent {}
<!-- DarkModeToggle.vue --><script setup>import { ref, watch, onMounted, onUnmounted } from "vue";const explicitTheme = ref(localStorage.getItem("theme") || "inherit");watch(explicitTheme, () => {	localStorage.setItem("theme", explicitTheme);});watch(explicitTheme, () => {	if (explicitTheme.value === "implicit") {		document.documentElement.className = explicitTheme.value;		return;	}	document.documentElement.className = explicitTheme.value;});const isOSDark = window.matchMedia("(prefers-color-scheme: dark)");const changeOSTheme = () => {	explicitTheme.value = isOSDark.matches ? "dark" : "light";};onMounted(() => {	isOSDark.addEventListener("change", changeOSTheme);});onUnmounted(() => {	isOSDark.removeEventListener("change", changeOSTheme);});</script><template>	<div style="display: flex; gap: 1rem">		<label style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: column">			<div>Light</div>			<input				name="theme"				type="radio"				:checked="explicitTheme === 'light'"				@change="explicitTheme = 'light'"			/>		</label>		<label style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: column">			<div>Inherit</div>			<input				name="theme"				type="radio"				:checked="explicitTheme === 'inherit'"				@change="explicitTheme = 'inherit'"			/>		</label>		<label style="display: inline-flex; flex-direction: column">			<div>Dark</div>			<input				name="theme"				type="radio"				:checked="explicitTheme === 'dark'"				@change="explicitTheme = 'dark'"			/>		</label>	</div></template>
<!-- App.vue --><script setup>import DarkModeToggle from "./DarkModeToggle.vue";</script><template>	<div>		<DarkModeToggle />		<p style="color: var(--primary)">This text is blue</p>	</div></template><style>:root {	--primary: #1a42e5;}.dark {	background: #121926;	color: #d6e4ff;	--primary: #6694ff;}</style>
Previous articleDynamic HTML
Next article Derived Values

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Subscribe to our newsletter to get updates on new content we create, events we have coming up, and more! We'll make sure not to spam you and provide good insights to the content we have.