Using JavaScript classes without the `class` keyword

Classes in JavaScript are both powerful and weird. While they allow us to create named objects with similarly purposed methods and properties, they're often misunderstood because of nuanced in the language itself.

But did you know that prior to 2015, JavaScript didn't even have a class keyword as part of the language?

Despite this, many programs at the time used classic Object Oriented Programming (OOP) methodologies such as using a class, extending it, and even adding static methods.

But without a class method, how did they even make classes?

A good question! Let's answer that and, along the way, look at:

• How to create a "class" without the class keyword
• How to "extend" a "class"
• How to add static methods to our "class"

Create public fields with the constructor

Let's look at a modern JavaScript class:

class User {    name = "Corbin",    username = "crutchcorn",    sayCatchphrase() {        console.log("It depends");    }}

This is a fairly basic class that has two properties (name and username) as well as a sayCatchphrase method.

However, despite the class keyword being added in 2015 with ES6, public fields like this weren't added until ECMAScript 2020:

So then how did classes get properties in years after 2015 but before 2020?

The answer? The constructor method:

class User {    constructor() {        this.name = "Corbin",        this.username = "crutchcorn",    }        sayCatchphrase() {        console.log("It depends");    }}

In fact, using this constructor method, we can even add the method as well:

class User {    constructor() {        this.name = "Corbin",        this.username = "crutchcorn",        this.sayCatchphrase = function() {            console.log("It depends");        }    }}

An interesting fact, for sure - but it doesn't answer the question of how to make a class.

Don't worry, we're getting there!

Create a class without the class keyword

Before we answer the question of "how to make a class in JavaScript without the class keyword", let's take a step back and look at what a class is actually doing...

After all, a class like User above might create an object like so:

const userObject = {    name: "Corbin",    username: "crutchcorn",    sayCatchphrase: function() {        console.log("It depends");    }}

Knowing this, we might think that the best way to make a class without the keyword is to return an object from a function:

function User() {    return {        name: "Corbin",        username: "crutchcorn",        sayCatchphrase: function() {            console.log("It depends");        }    }}

And sure enough, if we run this code using:

const user = new User();user.sayCatchphrase(); // "It depends"

It will run as-expected. However, it won't solve all cases. EG:

new User() instanceof User; // false

Instead, what if we just converted the aforementioned class' constructor body to a function?:

function User() {    this.name = "Corbin";    this.username = "crutchcorn";    this.sayCatchphrase = function() {   		console.log("It depends");	}}

Now, not only do we have the method working, but instanceof works as well:

const user = new User();user.sayCatchphrase(); // "It depends"new User() instanceof User; // true

Prototype Manipulation

But surely changing from a class to a function doesn't allow you to change the prototype in the same way?

Actually, it does! That's how this whole thing works!

Consider the following code:

function User() {    this.name = "Corbin";    this.username = "crutchcorn";}User.prototype.sayCatchphrase = function() {   console.log("It depends");}

This is the same way of adding a method as the this.sayCatchphrase method as before, but is done by changing the prototype.

We can test this code still works by running:

const user = new User();user.sayCatchphrase(); // "It depends"

Create an extended class using the super method

Before we talk about function-based class extension, we need to talk about pre-ES2020 class creation once again.

See, when we convert the following code to use a constructor:

class Person {	personality = "quirky";}class Corbin extends Person {	name = "Corbin";}

Like so:

class Person {    constructor() {    	this.personality = "quirky";    }}class Corbin extends Person {	constructor() {    	this.name = "Corbin";    }}

And try to initialize it:

const corn = new Corbin()

We get the following error:

Uncaught ReferenceError: Must call super constructor in derived class before accessing 'this' or returning from derived constructor
    at new Corbin (<anonymous>:9:6)

This is because we're not using the super() method to tell our extended class to utilize the parent's class' methods.

To fix this, we'll add that method to the extended class' constructor:

class Person {    constructor() {    	this.personality = "quirky";    }}class Corbin extends Person {	constructor() {		super();    	this.name = "Corbin";    }}

Now our Corbin constructor work work as-intended:

const corn = new Corbin();console.log(corn.name); // "Corbin";console.log(corn.personality); // "quirky";

Extend a functional class using Object.create

Let's now convert our Person and Corbin classes to use functions instead of the class keyword.

The person class is easy enough:

function Person() {    this.personality = "quirky";}

And we could use the call method to bind Person's this to Corbin, like so:

function Corbin() {    Person.call(this);    this.name = "Corbin";}

And it appears to work at first:

const corn = new Corbin();console.log(corn.name); // "Corbin";console.log(corn.personality); // "quirky";

But now, once again, if we call instanceof it doesn't support the base class:

new Corbin() instanceof Corbin; // truenew Corbin() instanceof Person; // false

To fix this, we need to tell JavaScript to use the prototype of Person and combine it with the prototype of Corbin, like so:

function Person() {}Person.prototype.personality = "quirky";function Corbin() {}Corbin.prototype = Object.create(Person.prototype);Corbin.prototype.name = "Corbin";const corn = new Corbin();corn.personality // "quirky"corn.name // "Corbin"const pers = new Person();pers.personality // "quirky"pers.name // undefined

Notice how we're using Object.create to create a base object from the other prototype

Static Methods

Let's wrap up this article by talking about how to add static methods to a functional class.

As a refresher, this is what a static method looks like on a ES2020 class:

class User {    name = "Corbin",    username = "crutchcorn",    static sayCatchphrase() {        console.log("It depends");    }}User.sayCatchphrase(); // "It depends"User.name // undefinedconst corn = new User();corn.name; // "Corbin"

This can be added by providing a key to the function's name outside of the function body:

function User() {    this.name = "Corbin",    this.username = "crutchcorn",}User.sayCatchphrase() {    console.log("It depends");}User.sayCatchphrase(); // "It depends"User.name // undefinedconst corn = new User();corn.name; // "Corbin"

Conclusion

This has been an interesting look into how to use JavaScript classes without the class keyword.

Hopefully, this has helped dispel some misunderstandings about how classes work in JavaScript or maybe just given historical context for why some code is written how it is.

Like learning JavaScript's fundamentals?

Check out my article that explains how to use the .bind keyword in JavaScript.

Read it and want more?

Check out my book that teaches the introduction of React, Angular, and Vue all at once; "The Framework Field Guide".

Until next time!